Search the
Stanford Review

Subscribe to
our newsletter

Feedback Advertising Information
Letter to the Editor
Comments for the Webmaster
Other contact information
Subscribe
(paper edition)

Donate
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

In This Issue
Editorial
News
Opinion
The Rawls Report

Columnists
Alec Rawls
Aliyya Haque
Bob McGrew
Dave Myszewski
Editorial Board
Gary J. Raichart
Harrison Y. Osaki
Joe Lonsdale
Ryan Wisnesky
Shawn M. Sims

Stanford Review Graphic
Volume XXXI, Issue 5 November 13, 2003
Stanford Review - Archive - Volume XXXI - Issue 5 - Opinion

Opinion
America's New Moral Battleground
America is currently engaged in a battle for its future. No, I'm not talking about the war on terrorism. I'm talking about the spiritual war for the heart and soul of our great country. ....Full story.....by Gary J. Raichart

Why Conservatives Should Support Gay Marriage
Across the United States, gay marriage has become a defining issue in state politics: California has enacted a ban on gay marriage, while Vermont has enshrined it as civil unions. Gay marriage is replacing abortion as social conservatives' most defining issue. Yet, by rights, gay marriage should be the least objectionable part of the so-called Œgay agenda.' Anti-discrimination laws impinge on the freedom of religious believers to choose who teaches their children, who leads their Boy Scout troop, whom they associate with. Hate crimes laws ask for special treatment for special victims. In contrast, gay marriage imposes no special obligation on heterosexuals and no special privileges for gays that straight people do not already enjoy. As Jon Stewart joked on the Daily Show, it's not like gay marriage will be mandatory. ....Full story.....by Bob McGrew

Liberals Just Say No - To Reality, Tolerance
We are all aware that the left is the dominant voice in today's universities, and that they hate loud, clearly articulated points of view that provide an alternate way of thinking about the world. (If you are liberal and do not believe this, picture someone well-intentioned setting out to do an objective study on the mental and physical distinctions among the races, using methods he's thought over to ensure unbiased results. Ooo, makes you angry. How dare he? Don't you hate that person? That "racist"! Don't worry, your friends chased him out of Stanford.) The liberals' response, whenever there is no logical way to reconcile their views with a more nuanced reality, is anger and censorship. Any viewpoints, or even statistics, that would refute the pretty-picture-reality that liberals have painted in their heads are despised. If it doesn't support the party line, it has no need to exist. ....Full story.....by Joe Lonsdale

Page last modified on Thursday, 02-Mar-2006 00:26:33 MST.